Teaching online using audio conversations
The Magic of conversations:
Flipped classroom origin
SELF Reflection
Critical thinking
Dialogue
Verbal processing
Fast exchange - feedback
Spacing: timing, digesting. Nothing big, lots of nibbles
Choice of materials: easy to digest, ownership, simple language
Everybody prepped!
The Setup
Informed consent: multiple notifications before term
Sending out syllabus
Including introductory video describing course
Open course a few days early
Doodle poll: 6am -11pm, 7days/wk
Poll due 2nd day 3pm – hard deadline
Multiple notifications of deadline
Create groups evening second day, notify
Quiz end week 1 – conditional release wk2: confirming logistics and committing to routine.
Create discussion board for group connection. Suggest introduction
Complex setup, runs easy once established
“Take this quick poll to let me know the ALL the times you could meet with your group each week. Pick ALLLLL the days you could possibly meet, then I'll play matchmaker and find folks to connect you with. The more days you have available, the easier it is for me to match you. The more availability you list, the more support you're showing for folks who are in a tough spot with childcare and inflexible bosses. The times and dates are NOT for THIS specific week, they would be the times you'd meet EVERY week. These meetings will be virtual, you just need a phone or computer with a good connection. Think of a time each week that you can consistently meet after having reviewed all of the written and video materials for the week. I have put in 3-hour time slots, even if you're not available for all 3 hours, mark the slots that have a match with your schedule.”
Assessment Strategy
Committed to making conversation priority
Individual preparation is mandatory – can’t participate otherwise
Spacing – due 24h before
Self-report: 1st Q - on time?
Grade: 44% individual work, 35% conversations, 10% self grade, 15% Signature assignment
Identical weeks, steady routine
Individual work posted in discussion: allows for peer “feedback” (no replies required)
Low stakes grading: individual work is about warm-up, not perfection
Low feedback: 1st individual, then conversation, then a weekly review video
How it’s gone:
Unusually high completion
Specific feedback praising conversations as learning tools
Some resistance early in term, some drops
I’m happy to help you if you want to try a version of this, just reach out!
Matchmaking – excel Sudoku:
- Doodle poll – 6am-11pm (3hr), 7days
- Beg for lots of flexibility, recognize it as Social Justice issue
- Multiple nags and a hard deadline (drop you)
- Export to excel
- Search and replace OK=1
- Do auto sum for each row
- Sort by sum results (fussiest at the top,
- most flexibility at the bottom)
- Visual matchmaking: start with the fussiest person, group with top 4-5 matches
- Try for groups of 4-5 (account for attrition)
- Prefer groups LATER in the week, avoid M-Tu-W
- Highlight with a color in excel (hold Ctrl to select multiple rows+columns)
- Repeat with next empty row
- Every once in a while do data-sort by cell color, shows the unmatched students easily.
- Trickier toward the end of group, may need to shift a couple to get groups of 4. Sometimes resort to 3s
- Once you have everybody in groups, send a group email message, ask them to connect right away to set up logistics: conference call? Skype? Hangouts? Messenger?
- Mandatory Quiz week one: logistics and schedule, conditional release wk2
- Groups that are set for early in the week may decide to work a week “behind” or do a double conversation the first week (ask for 48 hour spacing, no back-to-back
- Remind/offer flexibility for first week deadlines